Review: Meta services by Kani Baspinar (Sharingtools.services)

In short

Kani Baspinar sells paid Meta services through Sharingtools.services and his Telegram channel. On 23 August 2026 I ordered one of them for a client, an Instagram account unban. He sold it as the work of a “personal trusted contact inside Meta”, with whitelist included, a “100% guarantee”, “refund guaranteed” and clearing of the strikes on posts. I paid $1,250 (USDT TRC20).

The account came back on the evening of 25 August and was suspended again the same night. On 27 August, after the appeal that Kani himself asked us to file (“Appeal it, it will open directly”), Meta disabled it permanently. The whitelist protected nothing, the strikes were never cleared, the second unban was postponed several times and never delivered. On 3 September Kani stopped the work, and on 7 September he refused both to finish it and to return the money.

On this market, Meta unblocking services come with a guarantee of at least a month: if the account is banned again right away, it is restored again. Here the account was banned within hours, the guarantee had been promised in writing (“refund guaranteed”, “lifetime warranty”) and was then declared a “gift” I was “not entitled to”. With every problem the client turned out to be at fault: VPN, “bad IP”, “got banned themselves”, “fake identity”, “didn't inform us about the screen change”, “you are insulting”. The reasons, and the process itself, were invented as the work went along.

Below are cutouts from the Telegram conversation in chronological order: white messages on the left are Kani's, green ones on the right are mine. The client's personal data (account, email) is blacked out.

He set every price and every term himself, then said I wanted it cheap

What he proposed himself on 23 August:

• 13:35, asked “How much?”: “2000 usd”.
• 13:41, asked whether protection with a monthly fee existed: “We can unblock and whitelist also”, “Whitelisting included to unblock”, “So no need monthly fee”. He is the one who put the whitelist inside the price.
• 14:23, without any request for a discount: “I can even do it for you 1500 for multi orders in week”.
• 17:24, when I only asked him to confirm the terms: “Refund guaranteed service it is”, “%100 guarantee for unban in 3-7 days max”, “It is lifetime warranty”.
• 17:42, again unasked: “Let me make you discount for first order, we can do it for you from 1250 usd”. My reply was that the drop looked suspicious, not a request for more.
• 18:44, the deadline: “Will this be done in 1-3 days, as you said? By Wednesday.” — “Yes”.
• 25 August, during the work: “he will close also all that cases”, “he said he will add whitelist flag”, “customer will never face any problem in future”.

The one thing I did propose was the payment order: $1,000 now and $250 after the result, because he had refused an escrow. He agreed: “Okay you can send my commission side with second order”.

What he said after the second ban, when I asked him to honour those same terms:

• 26 Aug: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one” — a retroactive increase on an order already paid.
• 26 Aug: “But for all this headache I will not provide cheaper price honestly”.
• 26 Aug: “You want service with cheap price, alright then bulk order is possible”, “you don't contain reseller value for me honestly”.
• 28 Aug: “Whitelist feature 750 usd additional” — the whitelist he had called “included”.
• 3 Sep: “You are just as always talking endlessly about business and money and trying to make everything cheap”.
• 7 Sep: “Restriction removal is 2k per each case” — the cases “he will close”.
• 7 Sep: “Alex, you just ordered one profile and crying because you dont have money right now”.
• 7 Sep: “As usual, Alex want to pay so low but want to use ferrari.”

I never asked for a discount. I paid the price he named, in full, and asked for the things he had listed as part of it. Every extra dollar in this story was added by him after the failure, and every “cheap” refers to his own numbers.

Update, 7 September: the refusal, and a price list that keeps growing

4 September. Asked for news: “you will say sorry about what you said to us”. Asked again for a date: “I wasn't able to provide exact time because I don't know what you think but they don't click to button and open account… if they do, they got caught”.

7 September, 13:29. Instead of a date, a price list arrived:

• Unban Service — 1250
• Urgent Unban — 2500
• Whitelist — 1000
• Future Protection 1 Year — 2500
• Content Protection — 750
• Developer Application Approval — 2500
• Username claim — 2500
• Block an account — 3000
• Remove restrictions — 2000
• Meta Ads Manager Unban — 2500
• Meta Profile ads unban — 2500

The last five lines are new: on 31 August the list had six items. Two of them are worth reading next to his own earlier words.

“Block an account — 3000”. On 23 August, asked whether the competitors attacking my client could use the same channel, he wrote: “Meta contact can unban and whitelist but cannot ban and blacklist”. On 26 August I asked directly whether he runs a mass-report service for taking accounts down, and got “Nope I don't do that”. Two weeks later, blocking an account is a product with a price.

“Remove restrictions — 2000”. On 25 August, about the open cases on the client's posts, he wrote “he will close also all that cases” and “so I can let my guy approve appeals”. On 7 September the same work costs $2,000 per case, and he denies ever having promised it: “I didn't said that mod will remove”. There are more than ten such posts on the account, which is over $20,000.

His position on the money and on the service:

• I listed the five points of the agreement and asked whether he refuses both the work and the refund. His answer: “Did you pay anything to second unban? no. so good luck”.
• On how long the account survived he gave two different numbers within half an hour: at 13:29 “We unbanned your account, after almost 12 hours or else they got ban themselves”, at 13:54 “ban after 6 hours is not our case”.
• On the whitelist, which was sold as included in the price and as a “lifetime warranty”: “whitelist for mass report was gift but I just even ordered to remove it after this kinda behaviors”. So the protection the client paid for is now described as a gift, and he says he has had it removed in response to my complaints.
• On clearing the restrictions: “About removing restriction or else we didnt promise anything”.
• Told that the case would be published: “You are free to make it public”.

The conversation ended on “find some people to scam” and “go and find someone from market”. As of that moment the client's account is permanently disabled and the money has not been returned.

1. What was offered

23 August. Asked whether he has Meta contacts for unbanning: “Yes”, $2,000, “whitelisting included to unblock”, “personal trusted contact… I met with him”.

2. The guarantee in his own words

Asked to confirm the terms “with 100% certainty”: “Refund guaranteed service it is”, “%100 guarantee for unban in 3-7 days max”; on protection and whitelist: “It is lifetime warranty”. Whitelist, by his definition, is “preventing AI based auto ban”, and for mass-report cases the guarantee is “yes”.

3. Price, deadline, payment

The first thing that put me on guard, before any work had started, was the price falling as the conversation went on. Four hours, and I had not haggled once.

• 13:35 — “2000 usd”.
• 14:23 — “I can even do it for you 1500 for multi orders in week”.
• 17:29 — “1500 usd”.
• 17:42 — “Let me make you discount for first order, we can do it for you from 1250 usd”.

Minus 37.5% in four hours and seven minutes. I told him so at the time: “It seems suspicious that the price has dropped so much, but let's give it a try”. His answer named his own cost base: “We pay 1000 to contact”, “Remaining is my profit from this service”.

Later the price moved the other way. On 26 August, after the account had been banned again and I complained, he raised it retroactively on an order that was already paid for: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one”. Meta app approval went $750 (25 August) → $2,000 (26 August) → $2,500 (31 August), and the explanation moved with it: “first he said 500 now he talk about 1500”.

Deadline: “by Wednesday” (26 August) — “Yes”. Agreed: $1,000 upfront, $250 after the result. $1,000 was sent on 23 August at 19:36 to his USDT TRC20 wallet; the balance on 27 August.

4. The promise to clear the strikes on posts

On 23 August clearing the strikes (the content cases) was “$500 extra”. On 25 August, during the work: “he will close also all that cases”, “he said he will add whitelist flag”, “customer will never face any problem in future”. That evening, after the unban: “so I can whitelist also posts”, “so I can let my guy approve appeals”.

5. The request for the client's email and the letter from Meta

On 25 August at 15:03 Kani asked for the account owner's email: “he will reinstate it and send an email from system to get activation link”. The same night, at 00:59, that email received a message from Meta: “How was the support you received from Meta? Hi adventuring_with_kani”. Meta sends these surveys to the contact email of a support case, addressing the account that opened the case. adventuring_with_kani is Kani's own Instagram account. When I showed him the email, he did not dispute that the account is his.

His reply: “They just mixed it I mean meta and send auto feedback email. It is not related to me”.

6. Banned again within hours

The unban was at 20:43. At 00:41 the account was suspended again, the screen says “Suspended on August 25, 2026”. Kani's reaction in the morning: the cause is “bad ip / VPN”, “ban is not related ai or us”, and in the same breath: “Okay price 1500 usd from now including first one”. The price for Meta app approval went from $750 to $2,000 in one day.

An hour later he redefined the whitelist himself: “on ban wave side like ai take down profiles we still dont have access for that whitelist”. Three days earlier the whitelist was “preventing AI based auto ban”.

7. The client is always to blame

Every time something went wrong, the cause was found on the client's side, and every time it was a new one:

• 26 Aug, morning. “User using proxy on phone?”, “Bad ip usage”, “You didn't inform me that it is not actual connection it is vpn… it got problem because of weak information”. My answers (26–28 Aug): the account had already been banned five times by competitors and no moderator had ever blamed a VPN; the VPN is private, the IPs are clean (I gave a link to check), and 20 other accounts run on it without any issue.
• 26 Aug, 09:57. “Ban is not related ai or us”. Three days earlier the whitelist was “preventing AI based auto ban”.
• 27 Aug. “I unbanned account and user got ban again themselves… I'm not responsible after unban”. Then: “there is 40+ case… due to bad ip many time detected as fake account”.
• 28 Aug. A new rule after the fact: “if it got block again this time I'm not able to help”. And: “after unban you can't be responsible while whitelist is not included”. To my “you said everything was included for the clinic” — “yes it is but it didn't got ban from mass report”.
• 30 Aug. “Deadline changed since user didn't inform us about screen change”. I had forwarded him Meta's permanent-disable email on 27 Aug.
• 31 Aug. “account disabled because of fake identity. It cause usually outdated app version or bad ip address”. And: “if your users always become problematic like that it is not beneficial for me”.
• 3 Sep. “Second ban probably relate with shitty VPN and I'm not responsible”. And the work is stopped because “you are just insulting”.

The first version, the VPN, appeared before he had spoken to anyone: at 10:12 he wrote himself “I didn't talk with mod yet”, and at 12:04 the “contact” confirmed exactly that same version (“Ban reason was bad ip”). Every later explanation appeared as the conversation went on, without a single document or screenshot from his side.

8. The pattern: every question becomes disrespect, every failure becomes the client's fault

Read as a whole, the conversation is not a string of separate excuses. It is one set of moves, repeated from 23 August to 7 September. Here is each of them, in his own words.

1. A question is disrespect. 26 Aug: “And if you just here to blame it is ok”, “But for all this headache I will not provide cheaper price honestly”. 3 Sep: “I will not do any shit for you from now it is enough disrespect here”. 7 Sep: “we deserve respect”, “I'm not going to accept any excuse especially when I gift unban to someone”.
2. “Don't like it, go to the market”. Instead of an answer about the method or the date: 26 Aug “You don't need to work with us if it is not suit for you”; 3 Sep “As you think that unban is easy with meta verified support do it yourself then”; 7 Sep “if there is cheap work with them I dont care”, “Go and do”.
3. Pay first, then I will fix my own failure. 26 Aug, a few hours after the second ban: “To complete that order we need to get remaining payment”, “Complete your payment first”, “Because we proved ourself”. 7 Sep: “I will not move even my finger for this case… until payment”.
4. What was promised is retroactively a “gift”, and a gift can be taken back. On 25 Aug clearing the cases and the whitelist were part of the service. 31 Aug: “I promised it as bonus”. 3 Sep: “Second unban was gift”. 7 Sep: “whitelist for mass report was gift but I just even ordered to remove it”.
5. Changing my status to cancel the agreement. On 23 Aug $1,250 was agreed as the first-order price. 26 Aug: “you don't contain reseller value for me honestly”. 3 Sep: “I provide it to my resellers free of charge and you are not my reseller yet”. 7 Sep: “while you are not reseller I'm still giving you chance”.
6. The cause is always on the client's side. VPN, “bad IP”, “got banned themselves”, “fake identity”, “didn't inform us about the screen change”. Detailed in the section above.
7. Accusation in return. When the arguments run out, the person asking is declared the scammer. 7 Sep: “you always trying to steal something from someone”, “catch for yourself some stupid guy that you can scam easily”, “you always trying to fuck your partners”, “find some people to scam”. In March 2026, when another deal fell through: “find more people you can deceive”.
8. “I have plenty of other clients”. 31 Aug: “I got another resellers who is ordering so many accounts”. 3 Sep: “you waited because I'm busy with unbanning their orders”. 7 Sep: “I have a lot of good agencies that I work already”. Not one verifiable reference to any of them in three weeks.
9. Prepayment mandatory, escrow refused. 23 Aug: “I pay upfront to them so I can't take order like that”. 26 Aug: “while I dont get payment it is same you keep money or use guarantor”. 28 Aug: “All payments are upfront”. The risk sits with the client, always.
10. The method is “company rules”. Asked directly whether it is his own moderator or a support ticket, the manager on 2 Sep: “We have company rules that we are not allowed to disclose”.
11. Denying his own messages. 25 Aug: “he will close also all that cases”. 31 Aug: “Post based cases must be solved by user”. 7 Sep: “I didn't said that mod will remove”, “we didnt promise anything”. All three lines are in this conversation.

The pattern in one sentence: the client pays upfront, asks a question, is declared disrespectful, loses part of the service as a punishment, and is told at the end that he is the scammer.

9. Threats

26 August, 10:23–10:39: “…will be activated shortly and if we don't get payment right after activation we will suspend that account again”, “After we complete case if we don't get payment, 500 usd”, “I will not just ban your customer, your main and all related other ig accounts also”.

10. The advice “use Meta Verified”

The same day the “personal Meta contact”, via Kani, advises the client to get Meta Verified. Told that Meta Verified is unavailable in the interface (“you're on the waiting list”), the answer is: “Ah really. I didn't know that”.

11. Permanently disabled

On 27 August the client filed an appeal, as Kani advised (“Appeal it, it will open directly”). At 13:13 Meta replied: the account is permanently disabled. The same day I paid the balance. Kani: “We needed to wait this one now we can open it”, “my guy cleaning all of them one by one”.

12. New terms after the fact

On 28 August, five days after payment, a price list appeared: whitelist “750 usd additional”, “1 time unban free if account get ban in next 24 hours”, “all payments are upfront”. Then “unban and whitelist total 1500”. To my “everything turnkey, strikes removed, deal?”: “rules are simple, unban → 24 hours if there is ban, unban again. Whitelist also will protect account very well”. Even under these new rules the second unban was due.

13. Deadlines

The deadline for the second unban: “Monday” (31 August). On 30 August Kani asks for a current screenshot, sees “permanent” and writes “Perfect. That was what I need. Processing it”, then half an hour later: “Deadline changed since user didnt inform us about screen change. Probably Tuesday or Wednesday”. I had forwarded him Meta's permanent-disable email on 27 August (see above).

14. The strikes became a “bonus”

31 August: “We just unban the account. Post based cases must be solved by user”. I forwarded his own messages from 25 August. The reply: “I promised it as bonus… when there is second time unban I can't gift additional process”.

15. The password request

On 2 September Kani asked for the client's account password “to realtime check screen”. The screen had not changed since 27 August; I sent a screenshot. “We are handling that case, account will back soon”. “Today?” — “probably”.

16. Manager Yulia: the price list and “company rules”

On 31 August the Sharingtools manager sent a “final” price list: Unban 1250, Urgent 2500, Whitelist 1000, Future Protection 2500, Content Protection 750, Developer Application Approval 2500. Asked directly whether Kani works through his own moderator or through a regular Meta Verified support ticket: “We have company rules that we are not allowed to disclose”.

17. The refusal

3 September, 11 days after payment: “Checking with mods”. On the refund: “If customer wants refund first they can pay for second unban”. When I wrote that this looks like a regular support ticket: “I'm telling to my moderator to dont run that case since you are just insulting”, “do it yourself”, “don't bother me or Yulia”, “I don't own you anything”, “Second unban was gift”, “Until Sunday you can try… If you can't I can provide you service”.

18. The advert in his channel

Meanwhile a Sharingtools post appeared in Kani's Telegram channel: “So far, we've successfully unbanned 28 accounts”, with a list of services matching the 31 August price list: Unban, Urgent Unban, Whitelist, Future Protection, Content Protection, Developer Application Approval.

19. What I told them

So that nobody can say I kept quiet and then “suddenly” wrote a review. All of this is in the conversation, by date:

• 23 Aug. I proposed doing the first deal through an independent escrow. Refused: “I pay upfront to them”. I asked him to confirm the whitelist and the guarantee “with 100% certainty” and asked what happens if the account is banned again for no reason. I got: “refund guaranteed”, “lifetime warranty”, “about mass report based cases yes”.
• 26 Aug. After Meta's email to the client I asked him not to collect my clients' data or contact them. After the second ban: “you promised protection from AI blocks and a whitelist, the account was banned again within 12 hours”. On the VPN: private, clean IPs, 20 accounts running on it, no moderator has ever blamed a VPN. On prices: “I can't work with a partner whose prices change inexplicably every day and whose agreements aren't honoured; I've already quoted a price to my clients”. I asked what the app-approval price jump from 750 to 2,000 had to do with any of this. I suggested not guessing about the cause and waiting for the moderator's answer. I asked for full post-unban usage instructions so there would be no “you did something wrong”.
• 27 Aug. “The client paid, the account was unbanned, and less than a day later it was banned again. What exactly is unfair here?” “Everyone offering Meta unblocking services gives at least a one-month guarantee. A second ban within 10 hours is exactly the AI ban that the protection package was supposed to cover”. I paid the balance with a reservation: if this isn't resolved decently, I'll ask for a full refund. I asked what I was supposed to do if the client demanded their money back.
• 28 Aug. The clinic's account did not and cannot violate the rules: no automation, no prohibited content; my clients are white-hat businesses. My condition for further work: full guarantee, all strikes removed, turnkey. I proposed a three-way call with Yulia to fix what is and isn't included in the service. To his “no responsibility without whitelist”: “you said everything was included for the clinic, including the whitelist”.
• 31 Aug. “I told you about the permanent ban three days ago”. “Could this have happened because you didn't remove the strikes as promised?” “Will the strikes be removed as promised?” I forwarded his own messages from 25 Aug. “I'm not asking for anything supernatural, only what you promised yourself”. To Yulia: does future protection include all whitelists, strikes, the account itself, a one-year guarantee?
• 2 Sep. I refused to hand over the client's account password. I asked what the moderator says and what the deadline is. To Yulia, directly: is the method his own moderator inside Meta or a ticket through Meta Verified? If the latter, we don't need it: we've been doing that ourselves for a year, it doesn't work in complex cases.
• 3 Sep. “It looks like you're working through Meta Verified support and don't know yourself when they'll answer. A real moderator gives specific dates. What are these ‘40 security triggers’? Daily postponements”. Three points: the strikes weren't removed; the client received a support-quality email for your adventuring_with_kani account; the whole service list was invented on my case, with terms changing every day. “If what you said about the moderator is true, I take it back”. “A result or a refund by Sunday”.

Conclusion

My opinion. There is no moderator. I did not see a “personal contact inside Meta” at work; I saw a regular Meta Verified support ticket opened from Kani's own account, something any subscriber can do themselves for free. I saw services and prices invented on the fly, terms that changed every time I asked an uncomfortable question, written threats to ban the client's accounts and mine, and a walk-back of the guarantee he himself had promised.

The main point for anyone considering this service: ask in advance, and get it in writing, what happens if the account is banned again within hours. In my case the answer turned out to be “not our problem” and “the second unban was a gift”.

I do not recommend Kani Baspinar or Sharingtools.services for any paid Meta service, whether it is an unban, a whitelist, restriction removal, app approval or anything else on their list.